This one comes up in class a lot. Here’s the best explanation I’ve found:
Although there are exceptions it is generally better to use marry with an object i.e., marry somebody. For example:
▪ He married his college sweetheart.
▪ I want to marry a doctor or a lawyer
▪ I asked her to marry me.
▪ “Will you marry me?”
When there is no object, then use get married. For example:
▪ We got married on a beach in Thailand.
▪ I never want to get married.
▪ My parents got married because my mum was pregnant.
▪ We got married 30 years ago today.
Here are some exceptions:
He hopes to marry soon. // She married young. // They married for love, not money.
But if you stick to the above guideline you won’t go far wrong and you will sound more like a native speaker.
Some of my students asked about this, so here’s a link. Dunno how useful this is for exams and such like but it is entertaining 🙂
Both words mean ‘to move upwards’, but they are not interchangeable. ‘Rise’ is what we call an intransitive verb and ‘raise’ is a transitive verb.
To explain:
Intransitive verbs, like rise, do not require an object. For example:
The sun rises every morning.
She rose from her nap around 2 o’clock.
Transitive verbs, like raise, do require an object. For example:
I raised my hand to answer the question.
He raised the girl up onto his shoulders.
Note also that ‘raise’ is a regular verb: raise, raised, raised, whereas ‘rise’ is an irregular verb: rise, rose, risen.
But really most of the time it’s going to be a lot simpler to just remember which words and phrases go with ‘rise’ and which words and phrases go with ‘raise’. Here are some common uses of each:
The correct use of ‘rise’ is particularly important for Business English as it is used to describe movement on a line chart, see:
Here’s a pdf taken from Merriam-Webster with more usages and examples: raise-rise
You could also try a google search on collocations with rise / collocations with raise.
This post has been adapted from http://robin.hubpages.com/hub/Grammar_Mishaps__Raise_vs_Rise
http://www.englishpage.com/minitutorials/sosuch.html
Here is a fine explanation of the differences in how we use so/such, along with exercises at the bottom.
I’ve been asked a few times now what the difference is between a hyphen and a dash. So here’s the answer, perfectly answered at http://www.writingforward.com/ :
Just to add that my own preference is to include a single space before and after the em dash to set off an element added to amplify or to digress from the main clause. (Click on the link above and read through in order to understand what I am talking about). Here’s an example:
“I couldn’t take part in the race — although I badly wanted to — because I had to do an exam on the same day”.
Note that my computer has no em dash option hence the use of two en dashes together.
As many of you know, I am always quite keen to stop you from using sexist language such as “policeman” or masculine pronouns to refer to gender neutral words. So having just stumbled across this page, I thought I would share it with you:
http://www.aippg.com/ielts/downloads/Avoid%20Language%20Bias.htm
Here’s another one I was asked about recently. It seems that they are used interchangeably to talk about a person or an animal who/which has a “compulsive preoccupation with a fixed idea or an unwanted feeling or emotion, often accompanied by symptoms of anxiety.” This is especially so when used in psychiatry, or when colloquially we talk about someone being obsessed, as explained here:
obsessive [əbˈsɛsɪv]
adj
1. (Psychiatry) Psychiatry motivated by a persistent overriding idea or impulse, often associated with anxiety and mental illness
2. continually preoccupied with a particular activity, person, or thing
Source: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/obsessive
We can find plenty of examples of both words being used to express this concept here (obsessional):
http://bnc.bl.uk/saraWeb.php?qy=obsessional&mysubmit=Go
and here (obsessive):
http://bnc.bl.uk/saraWeb.php?qy=obsessive&mysubmit=Go
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/obsessive also gives us the definition:
“Excessive in degree or nature: an obsessive need to win.”
Here I would hesitate to say an obsessional need to win. Perhaps, as with many examples, it is more about common word partnerships or collocations than about which word is more correct. Obsessive is certainly more common and to my ears sounds better in all the following, although you can find examples with obsessional as well:
An obsessive need to win // obsessive behaviour // an obsessive fascination // his or her obsessive nature // an obsessive interest // obsessive jealousy
From a learner’s point of view, I would suggest the following: use obsessive yourself and you won’t go wrong, but be aware when reading that obsessional exists as well.
I can see no clear difference between these two words. They both refer to financial aid that is given by a giver to a receiver. Givers are often government bodies, either local or national, but not always. Receivers can be other government bodies, corporations, small businesses, academic institutions, NGOs, private individuals. The grant/subvention will be defined by the giver and then the word grant or subvention will be specified. Colloquially we talk about getting a grant, eg. to study, but in business it would perhaps more often be referred to as a subvention.
I was asked if this should be one word or two, and the answer is ONE. You can also say “most northern” or even northmost, although I notice my spellchecker doesn’t like that one, hehe. It is listed in the dictionary, but I would recommend sticking with northernmost.